Menu

Maxxis MA iPro Victra iPro

The Maxxis MA iPro Victra iPro is a High Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.9
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
88%
Wet Grip
78%
Road Feedback
83%
Handling
84%
Wear
68%
Comfort
77%
Buy again
85%
25 Reviews
80% Average
227,695 miles driven
Maxxis MA iPro Victra iPro

Maxxis MA iPro Victra iPro

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
7.9 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 25
Avg Rating: 80.4%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.23
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tire tests for the Maxxis MA iPro Victra iPro

Questions and Answers for the Maxxis MA iPro Victra iPro

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Maxxis MA iPro Victra iPro. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 15 user reviews

Drivers rate the Maxxis MA iPro Victra iPro highly for strong dry grip, confident handling/steering feedback, low noise, and good comfort, all at a very affordable price. Wet grip is generally praised as good to excellent for the money, with many reporting stable braking and high-speed confidence. The most common drawback is faster-than-expected tread wear, and a few note that wet performance is less secure at high speeds or once the tire is worn. Overall sentiment is strongly positive, with value and day-to-day performance standing out.

Strengths
  • Strong dry grip and cornering
  • Good wet grip for the price
  • Quiet/low road noise
  • Comfortable ride
  • Precise handling and steering feedback
  • Confident braking
  • Excellent value/affordability
Areas for Improvement
  • Fast tread wear/longevity
  • Wet grip less secure at high speeds or when worn

Top 3 Maxxis MA iPro Victra iPro Reviews

Given 92% while driving a Honda Civic FD2 (215/45 R17) on mostly town for 0 average miles
Superb grip in dry
November 16, 2024
Given 88% while driving a Honda City 1.5 VTI (205/50 R16) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
low noise compare to my stock tire
super grip during my sharp corner
super cheap compare to branded competitor
September 19, 2024
Given 97% while driving a Hyundai Accent MC (205/45 R16) on a combination of roads for 0 spirited miles
I used to fit from Continential Cc5 to MC6. No stock so try this Maxxis tires. Performance as good as Conti MC 6!!! And so much cheaper
June 20, 2023

How would you rate the Maxxis MA iPro Victra iPro?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Maxxis MA iPro Victra iPro Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 73% while driving a Mitsubishi lancer gt (225/45 R18) on mostly country roads for 0 average miles
I previously used Michelin PS4 tires. The PS4’s performance is indeed better, but the iPro is very affordable. Since my car is a manual, the PS4 never caused front-wheel slip, whereas with the iPro I’ve experienced slight front-wheel slip a few times. That said, the handling is actually really good.
January 6, 2026
Given 77% while driving a Mazda 6 GH 2.5 (225/45 R18) on mostly motorways for 0 spirited miles
Installed at my Mazda 6 GH....ample grip wet & dry...but not last longer...mine only 1 year plus...
January 27, 2023
Check out how the BEST all seasons tires perform against premium summer and winter tires!
Given 89% while driving a Honda Civic FD2 (215/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 400 spirited miles
Just installed to my car, then had a very great experience driving on rain/wet road as the tires were very grip. I can drive 110-130km/h on wet surface. For dry road, for sure they are doing their magic excellently. The price is very affordable, RM210 per piece.
September 23, 2020
Given 67% while driving a Honda Accord Inspire (225/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 23,600 average miles
Used for 38000 km (23600 miles) on my 2010 Honda Accord 2.4 for 18 months. Tires are used on tropical country (Malaysia). Dry road performance is great, on wet road perform exceptionally well too, tread wear was fast (50%) after around 20000 km, tires are silent but became noisier as the thickness reduced and comfort is average. IMHO this tire is suitable for a short term usage less than 2 years/ 40000 km (25000 miles) as tread wear is rated at 240. What makes this a good tire is the price, which is around USD 61.00 per piece for 225/45/18. Overall i am satisfy with the performance of this tires for the money that i have paid. Pros: Bang for bucks UHP, excellent dry grip on dry road, and comfortable. Cons for these tires are low tread wear, loosing grip in the wet once the thickness is less than 60% and became increasingly noiser.
July 21, 2020
Given 71% while driving a BMW 520d (225/50 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 18,000 spirited miles
I am using Maxxis Ipro in Thailand with 520d and 320i. The tire is amazingly having great handling ability, especially on dry road. I normally drive fast but with this tire, I am assured with the safety given from the tire because it gives me honest feedback to the steering wheel and to the car chassis. This tire is not soft like Hankook V12 Evo2 but with its higher stiffness, I am more pleased when driving because it goes straight just as I expect it to go when I turn the steering wheel.

With its economical price, I am absoloutely pleased with this tire. In my opinion, it perform even greater than my Bridgestone S001 RFT given with the car because I-Pro gives my more honest road feedback than S001 RFT.

Only not outstanding part of I-Pro for me is the wet road grip. It is not unacceptable, but on wet road, I am not dare driving in high speed on them because it tends to understeer and the turn is not at the most accurate level with I-Pro on wet but only I slowdown just a bit, I can drive with joy.
July 26, 2019
Given 67% while driving a Daihatsu Perodua Axia (195/50 R15) on a combination of roads for 15,000 average miles
Great value for the price. Surprised with the grip on both wet and dry at this price point. Wears quite quickly though, only driven for slightly over 15,000 km and it's already at 50% level.
June 1, 2019
Given 81% while driving a Toyota Perodua Alza (205/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 28,000 average miles
Value For Money with Great Performance....

Mine 205.45.17 size installed at Perodua Alza (Toyota Passo Sette). Very comfort although use almost 2 years, still silent and no noise. The grip performance also good with good breaking in wet condition. This week i will replace my tire and will use this tire again because it very economy with great performance.

Tire Spec: Threadware 240, Traction AA, Temperature A
Very Economy: MYR210/piece
Comfort: Like Conti Max Comfort
Grip: Better than Michelin Pilot Sport 3
December 5, 2017
Given 86% while driving a Nissan R33 Skyline GtS25T (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 1,000 spirited miles
have them on the front of my turbocharged 2.5L skyline around 3100lbs
they grip and offer a good ride on bumpy jamaican roads

i find they do fairly well in jamaica and i have frequently taken them to over 100mph 140mph max thus far in them

they hold up well and braking and cornering makes them feel like they are glued to the road great traction even in rain
May 27, 2015
Given 84% while driving a Honda Civic FD1 1.8 i Vtec (225/45 R17 W) on mostly town for 3,000 spirited miles
Got this for my honda civic. I had installed kenda but they were very hard and slippery. Immediately changed for these tires. They offer amazing grip and feedback. I m impressed and they are not much expensive.
November 20, 2014
Given 79% while driving a Subaru (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 3,000 spirited miles
Outstanding grip at normal/legal speeds. Pressures of 37-39 psi (same front & rear) work best for me- 'dialing' out most/all understeer possible on factor suspension. Excellent grip in wet (lower levels of grip than dry but still very impressive). Noise levels low, more than happy with them. Comfort levels are dependent on pressures. Overall good/great balance of comfort /handling/noise. My ONLY concern is the higher than expected wear rate. The tire sells for $210-230 RRP here in Australia so that price makes that one issue less of a concern. After many months trying to find a tire I could be happy with for a price I can afford, I have finally found ONE and trying to find a 'better tire' (for me) is probably not going to be worth the effort. 3.5-4/5 Overall score.
August 25, 2012
Given 87% while driving a Honda Fit (Jazz) (195/55 R15) on a combination of roads for 1,500 spirited miles
switched to these babys from my previous yokohama db set. have to say was at first skeptical as salesman was trying hard to push for sales of these.... did some research online and asking around and decided to give them a shot due to mainly positive feedback from both channels. paid 96usd (125sgd) per piece. have to say im VERY impressed with them.

Dry road, handling was excellent with me taking in corners and overtaking like a madman, breaking distance was noticeably reduced as compared to my former tires.

Wet road, was nothing outstanding but considerably better than most tires ive tried (yokohama/fit, brigestone/fit, bridgestone/picnic, hankook/lancer etc) normal wet highway driving could handle 110km/h easily, deep puddles have to be abit more careful.

Noise, well maybe only one notch above the yokohama db

Comfort, pretty darned comfortable =)

October 5, 2011
Given 79% while driving a Honda Civic FD1 1.8 i Vtec (215/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 75 average miles
at first wanted to buy either yokohama c drive and dunlop tires. but recommended to use this tire. less noise, good grip in dry and wet condition since it has AA traction. an honda Odyssey owner also recommends this tire to me. in the end, decided to buy this tire. first impression, wow! nice grip especially at cornering and sharp bend. good tire!
December 1, 2010
Rate the Maxxis MA iPro Victra iPro