Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5

In this article we will be looking at independent tire test data, and real world driver reviews of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 and the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 to find out which tire is best for your own driving.

There are a few basic differences between the two tires. The Kumho Ecsta PS71 is an Ultra-High-Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars, and the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is an Max-Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars

Ecsta-PS71 VS Pilot-Sport-5

Test Results

Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been five tests which compare both tires directly!

Out of these five tests:

  • Michelin Pilot Sport 5 finished ahead of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 in five of the tests

While it might look like the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is better than the Kumho Ecsta PS71 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.

Dry Braking

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during four dry braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 stopped the vehicle in 1.5% less distance than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.

Kumho Ecsta PS71
34.66M
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
34.14M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

2023 Summer Tire Market Overview
225/45 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:35.1M Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 34.1M
2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test
225/45 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:35.1M Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 34.1M
2025 Summer Tire Test Shootout
225/40 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:34.2M Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 33.5M
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:34.8M Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 35.5M
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test
225/40 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:34.1M Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 33.5M

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was 1.09% faster around a lap than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.

Kumho Ecsta PS71
118.5Km/H
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
119.8Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test
225/45 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:118.4Km/H Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 119.1Km/H
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test
225/40 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:118.6Km/H Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 120.5Km/H

Wet Braking

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during three wet braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 stopped the vehicle in 1.13% less distance than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.

Kumho Ecsta PS71
33.72M
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
33.34M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

2023 Summer Tire Market Overview
225/45 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:26.6M Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 26M
2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test
225/45 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:41.6M Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 40.6M
2025 Summer Tire Test Shootout
225/40 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:27.4M Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 27.7M
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:30.2M Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 29.2M
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test
225/40 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:42.8M Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 43.2M

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 stopped the vehicle in 1.94% less distance than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.

Kumho Ecsta PS71
36M
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
35.3M
Wet braking on Concrete in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:36M Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 35.3M

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was 0.27% faster around a wet lap than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.

Kumho Ecsta PS71
74.2Km/H
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
74.4Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test
225/45 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:74.6Km/H Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 75.5Km/H
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test
225/40 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:73.8Km/H Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 73.3Km/H

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was 0.67% faster around a wet circle than the Michelin Pilot Sport 5.

Kumho Ecsta PS71
14.73s
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
14.83s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Kumho Ecsta PS71

2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test
225/40 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:14.73s Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 14.83s

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 floated at a 0.97% higher speed than the Michelin Pilot Sport 5.

Kumho Ecsta PS71
89.57Km/H
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
88.7Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Kumho Ecsta PS71

2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test
225/45 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:103.7Km/H Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 105.7Km/H
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:83.7Km/H Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 79.9Km/H
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test
225/40 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:81.3Km/H Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 80.5Km/H

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 slipped out at a 3.57% higher speed than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.

Kumho Ecsta PS71
3.24m/sec2
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
3.36m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test
225/45 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:3.63m/sec2 Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 3.83m/sec2
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:3m/sec2 Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 3m/sec2
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test
225/40 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:3.09m/sec2 Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 3.25m/sec2

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scored 6% more points than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.

Kumho Ecsta PS71
4.7 Points
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
5 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test
225/40 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:4.7 Points Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 5 Points

Noise

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during three noise tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 measured 1.39% quieter than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.

Kumho Ecsta PS71
74.77dB
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
73.73dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test
225/45 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:75.3dB Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 73.8dB
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:73.6dB Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 73.1dB
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test
225/40 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:75.4dB Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 74.3dB

Wear

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during three wear tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is predicted to cover 27.95% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.

Kumho Ecsta PS71
39426.67KM
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
54723.33KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test
225/45 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:38800KM Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 55600KM
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:37300KM Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 56400KM
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test
225/40 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:42180KM Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 52170KM

Value

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during two value tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 proved to have a 2.18% better value based on price/1000km than the Michelin Pilot Sport 5.

Kumho Ecsta PS71
10.3Price/1000
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
10.53Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Kumho Ecsta PS71

2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test
225/45 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:12.37Price/1000 Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 12.5Price/1000
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:11.05Price/1000 Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 10.35Price/1000
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test
225/40 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:7.49Price/1000 Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 8.74Price/1000

Price

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during one price tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 cost 30.94% less than the Michelin Pilot Sport 5.

Kumho Ecsta PS71
480
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
695
Price in local currency, lower is better

Best In Price: Kumho Ecsta PS71

2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test
225/45 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:480 Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 695

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 had a 1.27% lower rolling resistance than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.

Kumho Ecsta PS71
8.63kg / t
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
8.52kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test
225/45 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:8.06kg / t Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 8.09kg / t
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test
225/40 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:9.19kg / t Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 8.94kg / t

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 used 1.75% less fuel than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.

Kumho Ecsta PS71
5.7l/100km
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
5.6l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:5.7l/100km Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 5.6l/100km

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 emitted 34.54% less particle wear matter than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.

Kumho Ecsta PS71
85.7mg/km/t
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
56.1mg/km/t
Weight of Tire Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t), lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71:85.7mg/km/t Michelin Pilot Sport 5: 56.1mg/km/t

Real World Driver Reviews

Tire Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Kumho Ecsta PS71 and Michelin Pilot Sport 5.

In total the Kumho Ecsta PS71 has been reviewed 76 times and drivers have given the tire 78% overall.

The Michelin Pilot Sport 5 has been reviewed 74 times and drivers have given the tire 85% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Michelin Pilot Sport 5.

Best Review for the Kumho Ecsta PS71
Given 83% 225/45 R17 on mostly motorways for 500 spirited miles
same kumho problem... balancing & egg shape. 245/45/18 100Y XL
I've always used kumho because the price well reflects in proformance if only they didn't need constant rebalencing.
I've had 4 duff pairs, ku31 x 2 pair, ku 39 x 2 pair that had to come off in the end they were so bad.
No amount of balencing can sort an egg shape tire.
These new ps71 are very soft, squishy, feel like running on 20psi with 30g wheel wobble even after twice rebalencing them & 1 of them is egg shape.
I am worn out with trying to get them right & think after years of kumho on... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 326 - tire reviewed on March 25, 2017
View all Kumho Ecsta PS71 driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Given 89% 225/40 R18 on mostly country roads for 2,000 spirited miles
I've bought the new Michelin Pilot Sport 5 for my Golf R as I previously had the Pilot Sport 4 tires. What a fantastic difference these new tire are. Theres far less noise, the grip in the wet is better and the dry grip is almost the same if not better as well. I would definitely be buying these again.
Helpful 531 - tire reviewed on January 12, 2022
View all Michelin Pilot Sport 5 driver reviews >>

Conclusion

In conclusion the Kumho Ecsta PS71 performed better in wet circle, straight aqua, value and price, while the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 performed better in dry braking, dry handling [km/h], wet braking, wet braking - concrete, wet handling [km/h], curved aquaplaning, subj. comfort, noise, wear, rolling resistance, fuel consumption and abrasion.

Which tire is best for you depends a lot on your driving style and situation, plus what you want from the tire. Comparing all the data in the tire reviews database, on balance Michelin Pilot Sport 5 seems to be the best tire overall.

However, it's important to note that both tires have their strengths.

Remember, the best tire for you might depend on which of these factors are most important for your specific driving needs and conditions.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Overall Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:


Footnote

This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.

Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.