Dry Braking - Cool

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during one dry braking - cool tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO stopped the vehicle in 2.31% less distance than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Dry Braking - Cool: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Dry Braking - Cool winner was calculated >>

Dry Braking

Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during four dry braking tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac stopped the vehicle in 0.3% less distance than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Dry Braking: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling - Cool [s]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during one dry handling - cool [s] tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac was 0.26% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Dry Handling - Cool [s]: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Dry Handling - Cool winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during two dry handling [s] tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac was 0.76% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was 0.15% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking

Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during six wet braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO stopped the vehicle in 3.81% less distance than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Wet Braking: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking - Cool

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during two wet braking - cool tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO stopped the vehicle in 5% less distance than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Wet Braking - Cool: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Wet Braking - Cool winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling - Cool [s]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during one wet handling - cool [s] tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac was 0.22% faster around a wet lap than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Wet Handling - Cool [s]: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Wet Handling - Cool winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac was 2.14% faster around a wet lap than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during zero wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was 1.56% faster around a wet lap than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was 0.17% faster around a wet circle than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Wet Circle: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during zero straight aqua tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO floated at a 3.4% higher speed than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Straight Aqua: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO slipped out at a 1.8% higher speed than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>

Snow Braking

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during four snow braking tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac stopped the vehicle in 4.6% less distance than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Snow Braking: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac accelerated 0.34% faster than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Snow Traction: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during zero snow traction tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO had 5.95% better snow traction than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Snow Traction: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during one snow handling [s] tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac was 0.1% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Snow Handling [s]: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during zero snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was 3.42% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Circle

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac was 2.41% faster around a snow circle than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Snow Circle: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during zero snow slalom tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was 11.65% faster through a slalom than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Snow Slalom: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>

Subj. Comfort

Best In Subj. Comfort: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during three noise tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO measured 0.51% quieter than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Noise: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Tire Weight

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during one tire weight tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO weighed 3.29% less than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Tire Weight: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Tire Weight winner was calculated >>

Wear

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during one wear tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO is predicted to cover 20.09% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Wear: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Wear winner was calculated >>

Value

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during two value tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac proved to have a 14.58% better value based on price/1000km than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Value: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Value winner was calculated >>

Price

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during three price tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac cost 4.53% less than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Price: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Price winner was calculated >>

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during four rolling resistance tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO had a 3.76% lower rolling resistance than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Rolling Resistance: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO used 1.26% less fuel than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Fuel Consumption: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac emitted 20.91% less particle wear matter than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Abrasion: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>