Dry Braking

Looking at data from eight tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during eight dry braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 6.48% less distance than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Dry Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 0.02% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was 0.19% faster around a lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking

Looking at data from eight tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during seven wet braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO stopped the vehicle in 3.15% less distance than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Braking: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking - Cool

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during one wet braking - cool tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO stopped the vehicle in 4.88% less distance than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Braking - Cool: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Wet Braking - Cool winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was 0.72% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during four wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was 2.29% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Circle

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during three wet circle tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was 1.75% faster around a wet circle than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Circle: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during one straight aqua tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO floated at a 4.54% higher speed than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO slipped out at a 4.98% higher speed than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>

Snow Braking

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during six snow braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 7.67% less distance than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Snow Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two snow traction tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 accelerated 28.83% faster than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Snow Traction: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during zero snow traction tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO had 7.56% better snow traction than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Snow Traction: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two snow handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 7.93% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Snow Handling [s]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during zero snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was 4.88% faster around a lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Circle

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 4.2% faster around a snow circle than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Snow Circle: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during zero snow slalom tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was 17.54% faster through a slalom than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Snow Slalom: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>

Subj. Comfort

Best In Subj. Comfort: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during five noise tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 measured 0.81% quieter than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Noise: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one noise tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 measured 0.29% quieter than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Noise: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Tire Weight

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during one tire weight tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO weighed 4.77% less than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Tire Weight: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Tire Weight winner was calculated >>

Wear

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during one wear tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO is predicted to cover 0.88% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wear: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Wear winner was calculated >>

Value

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during two value tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO proved to have a 18.12% better value based on price/1000km than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Value: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Value winner was calculated >>

Price

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during five price tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO cost 15.02% less than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Price: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Price winner was calculated >>

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during five rolling resistance tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had a 4.57% lower rolling resistance than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Rolling Resistance: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO used 3.17% less fuel than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Fuel Consumption: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 emitted 35% less particle wear matter than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Abrasion: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>