Dry Braking

Looking at data from twenty tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during twenty dry braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 9.25% less distance than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.

Best In Dry Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during three dry handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was 0.55% faster around a lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from ten tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during six dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was 0.19% faster around a lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 scored 5% more points than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking

Looking at data from twenty tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during fifteen wet braking tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 stopped the vehicle in 1.92% less distance than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Braking: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking - Cool

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one wet braking - cool tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 0.9% less distance than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.

Best In Wet Braking - Cool: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Wet Braking - Cool winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 stopped the vehicle in 2.68% less distance than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during four wet handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was 2.4% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from ten tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during ten wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was 2.98% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 scored 8% more points than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Circle

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during three wet circle tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 had 3.44% higher lateral wet grip than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Circle: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from sixteen tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during four straight aqua tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 floated at a 1.97% higher speed than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from twelve tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during eight curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 slipped out at a 0.49% higher speed than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>

Snow Braking

Looking at data from sixteen tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during ten snow braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 1.38% less distance than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.

Best In Snow Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during four snow traction tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 accelerated 9.67% faster than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.

Best In Snow Traction: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from eleven tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during three snow traction tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 had 1.57% better snow traction than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Snow Traction: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [s]

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during four snow handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 2.56% faster around a lap than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.

Best In Snow Handling [s]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from ten tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during one snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was 2.24% faster around a lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Snow Handling

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during zero subj. snow handling tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 scored 2.58% more points than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Subj. Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Circle

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 provided 1.94% more lateral grip than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Snow Circle: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during zero snow slalom tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was 5.85% faster through a slalom than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Snow Slalom: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>

Ice Braking

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during one ice braking tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 stopped the vehicle 5.56% shorter than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Ice Braking: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

See how the Ice Braking winner was calculated >>

Subj. Comfort

Best In Subj. Comfort: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from thirteen tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during ten noise tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 measured 0.97% quieter than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.

Best In Noise: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during one noise tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 measured 0.14% quieter than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Noise: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Tire Weight

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during three tire weight tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 weighed 4.2% less than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Tire Weight: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

See how the Tire Weight winner was calculated >>

Wear

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during four wear tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 is predicted to cover 10.07% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wear: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

See how the Wear winner was calculated >>

Value

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during three value tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 proved to have a 17.4% better value based on price/1000km than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Value: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

See how the Value winner was calculated >>

Price

Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during six price tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 cost 10.84% less than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Price: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

See how the Price winner was calculated >>

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from fourteen tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during thirteen rolling resistance tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had a 8.08% lower rolling resistance than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.

Best In Rolling Resistance: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three fuel consumption tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 used 1.85% less fuel than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.

Best In Fuel Consumption: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 emitted 13.86% less particle wear matter than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.

Best In Abrasion: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 lost 13.89% less particle wear matter than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.

Best In Abrasion: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>