Dry Braking

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during five dry braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 3.26% less distance than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.

Best In Dry Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 was 0.36% faster around a lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Nexen N Blue 4Season 2

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 1.43% faster around a lap than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during five wet braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 4.96% less distance than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.

Best In Wet Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 0.88% faster around a wet lap than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 1.72% faster around a wet lap than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Circle

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three wet circle tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 0.94% faster around a wet circle than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.

Best In Wet Circle: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during four straight aqua tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 floated at a 9.57% higher speed than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.

Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 slipped out at a 11.59% higher speed than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>

Snow Braking

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during four snow braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 3.67% less distance than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.

Best In Snow Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during four snow traction tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had 8.06% better snow traction than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.

Best In Snow Traction: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one snow handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 8.85% faster around a lap than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.

Best In Snow Handling [s]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 4.38% faster around a lap than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Circle

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 provided 3% more lateral grip than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.

Best In Snow Circle: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three snow slalom tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 8.51% faster through a slalom than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.

Best In Snow Slalom: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>

Subj. Comfort

Best In Subj. Comfort: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three noise tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 measured 1.74% quieter than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.

Best In Noise: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Tire Weight

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one tire weight tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 weighed 3.85% less than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.

Best In Tire Weight: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Tire Weight winner was calculated >>

Wear

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 was better during one wear tests. On average the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 is predicted to cover 23.97% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wear: Nexen N Blue 4Season 2

See how the Wear winner was calculated >>

Value

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 was better during one value tests. On average the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 proved to have a 47.49% better value based on price/1000km than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Value: Nexen N Blue 4Season 2

See how the Value winner was calculated >>

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during four rolling resistance tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had a 10.34% lower rolling resistance than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.

Best In Rolling Resistance: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 used 3.52% less fuel than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.

Best In Fuel Consumption: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>