Dry Braking

Looking at data from thirteen tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during thirteen dry braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 6.38% less distance than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Best In Dry Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during two dry handling [s] tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was 0.63% faster around a lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during three dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was 0.12% faster around a lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 scored 5% more points than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking

Looking at data from thirteen tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during ten wet braking tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 stopped the vehicle in 1.14% less distance than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Braking: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 2.84% less distance than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during three wet handling [s] tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was 1.7% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during five wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was 2.32% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 scored 6.12% more points than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Circle

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during six wet circle tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was 2.48% faster around a wet circle than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Circle: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from ten tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 floated at a 3.12% higher speed than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during seven curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 slipped out at a 7.99% higher speed than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>

Snow Braking

Looking at data from ten tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during eight snow braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 1.64% less distance than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Best In Snow Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two snow traction tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 accelerated 7.97% faster than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Best In Snow Traction: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from eight tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 had 4.23% better snow traction than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Snow Traction: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [s]

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three snow handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 4.4% faster around a lap than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Best In Snow Handling [s]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during two snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was 1.3% faster around a lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Snow Handling

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during zero subj. snow handling tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 scored 5% more points than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Subj. Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Circle

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during zero snow circle tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 provided 4.5% more lateral grip than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Snow Circle: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during zero snow slalom tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was 7.85% faster through a slalom than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Snow Slalom: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>

Ice Braking

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one ice braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle 5.71% shorter than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Best In Ice Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Ice Braking winner was calculated >>

Subj. Comfort

Best In Subj. Comfort: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from eight tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during four noise tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 measured 0.7% quieter than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Best In Noise: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during one noise tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 measured 0.29% quieter than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Noise: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Tire Weight

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three tire weight tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 weighed 2.55% less than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Best In Tire Weight: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Tire Weight winner was calculated >>

Wear

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during three wear tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 is predicted to cover 3.85% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wear: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

See how the Wear winner was calculated >>

Value

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during three value tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 proved to have a 23.55% better value based on price/1000km than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Value: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

See how the Value winner was calculated >>

Price

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during five price tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 cost 25.65% less than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Price: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

See how the Price winner was calculated >>

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from nine tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during nine rolling resistance tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had a 11.81% lower rolling resistance than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Best In Rolling Resistance: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two fuel consumption tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 used 2.14% less fuel than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Best In Fuel Consumption: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 emitted 38.89% less particle wear matter than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Best In Abrasion: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 emitted 7.14% less particle wear matter than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Best In Abrasion: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>