Dry Braking

Looking at data from eight tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during eight dry braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 5.32% less distance than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

Best In Dry Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two dry handling [s] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 1.08% faster around a lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 0.12% faster around a lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two subj. dry handling tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scored 3.37% more points than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking

Looking at data from eight tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during eight wet braking tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 stopped the vehicle in 4.7% less distance than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Braking: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking - Cool

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one wet braking - cool tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 stopped the vehicle in 0.6% less distance than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Braking - Cool: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

See how the Wet Braking - Cool winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 3.16% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during four wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 3.57% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scored 4.57% more points than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Circle

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during four wet circle tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 2.22% faster around a wet circle than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Circle: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during zero straight aqua tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 floated at a 2.22% higher speed than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during three curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 slipped out at a 2.53% higher speed than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>

Snow Braking

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during six snow braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 2.02% less distance than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

Best In Snow Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 accelerated 2.57% faster than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Snow Traction: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during zero snow traction tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 had 2.48% better snow traction than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Snow Traction: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two snow handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 2.61% faster around a lap than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

Best In Snow Handling [s]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 0.59% faster around a lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Snow Handling

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during zero subj. snow handling tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scored 2.73% more points than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Subj. Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Circle

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during zero snow circle tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 provided 5.94% more lateral grip than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Snow Circle: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during zero snow slalom tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 1.64% faster through a slalom than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Snow Slalom: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>

Ice Braking

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one ice braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle 1.99% shorter than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

Best In Ice Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Ice Braking winner was calculated >>

Ice Traction

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one ice traction tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 accelerated 3.97% faster than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

Best In Ice Traction: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Ice Traction winner was calculated >>

Subj. Comfort

Best In Subj. Comfort: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during three noise tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 measured 0.07% quieter than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Noise: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Tire Weight

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one tire weight tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 weighed 5.91% less than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

Best In Tire Weight: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Tire Weight winner was calculated >>

Wear

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two wear tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is predicted to cover 1.37% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wear: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Wear winner was calculated >>

Value

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one value tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 proved to have a 2.66% better value based on price/1000km than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

Best In Value: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Value winner was calculated >>

Price

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one price tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 cost 8.45% less than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Price: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

See how the Price winner was calculated >>

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during four rolling resistance tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had a 2.37% lower rolling resistance than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

Best In Rolling Resistance: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two fuel consumption tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 used 1.16% less fuel than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

Best In Fuel Consumption: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 lost 33.38% less particle wear matter than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

Best In Abrasion: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>