Dry Braking - Cool

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during one dry braking - cool tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO stopped the vehicle in 4.28% less distance than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Best In Dry Braking - Cool: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Dry Braking - Cool winner was calculated >>

Dry Braking

Looking at data from thirteen tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during thirteen dry braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO stopped the vehicle in 4.69% less distance than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Best In Dry Braking: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling - Cool [s]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during one dry handling - cool [s] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact was 0.13% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Dry Handling - Cool [s]: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Dry Handling - Cool winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during two dry handling [s] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact was 0.22% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during seven dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was 1.06% faster around a lap than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking

Looking at data from thirteen tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during nine wet braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO stopped the vehicle in 2.81% less distance than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Best In Wet Braking: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking - Cool

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during two wet braking - cool tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO stopped the vehicle in 8.24% less distance than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Best In Wet Braking - Cool: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Wet Braking - Cool winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling - Cool [s]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during one wet handling - cool [s] tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was 1.09% faster around a wet lap than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Best In Wet Handling - Cool [s]: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Wet Handling - Cool winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact was 0.52% faster around a wet lap than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during four wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was 0.35% faster around a wet lap than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Circle

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact was 1.98% faster around a wet circle than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Wet Circle: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from ten tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO floated at a 2.54% higher speed than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Best In Straight Aqua: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO slipped out at a 5.73% higher speed than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>

Snow Braking

Looking at data from ten tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during ten snow braking tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact stopped the vehicle in 6.55% less distance than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Snow Braking: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during two snow traction tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact accelerated 17.79% faster than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Snow Traction: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO had 4.35% better snow traction than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Best In Snow Traction: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [s]

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during three snow handling [s] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact was 5.31% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Snow Handling [s]: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during zero snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was 4.87% faster around a lap than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Circle

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact was 2.78% faster around a snow circle than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Snow Circle: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during zero snow slalom tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was 13% faster through a slalom than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Best In Snow Slalom: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>

Subj. Comfort

Best In Subj. Comfort: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from nine tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during six noise tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO measured 0.45% quieter than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Best In Noise: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during one noise tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact measured 0.14% quieter than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Noise: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Tire Weight

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during one tire weight tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact weighed 0.6% less than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Tire Weight: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Tire Weight winner was calculated >>

Wear

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during one wear tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO is predicted to cover 10.62% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Best In Wear: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Wear winner was calculated >>

Value

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during two value tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO proved to have a 6.3% better value based on price/1000km than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Best In Value: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Value winner was calculated >>

Price

Looking at data from nine tire tests, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was better during seven price tests. On average the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO cost 5.8% less than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Best In Price: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

See how the Price winner was calculated >>

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from ten tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during six rolling resistance tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact had a 0.53% lower rolling resistance than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Rolling Resistance: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact used 3.1% less fuel than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Fuel Consumption: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact emitted 2.73% less particle wear matter than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Best In Abrasion: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>