Dry Braking

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during four dry braking tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 1.58% less distance than the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV.

Best In Dry Braking: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 0.84% faster around a lap than the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV.

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scored 20% more points than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was better during three wet braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV stopped the vehicle in 1.72% less distance than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.

Best In Wet Braking: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was 1.24% faster around a wet lap than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 0.45% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV.

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Circle

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 0.24% faster around a wet circle than the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV.

Best In Wet Circle: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was better during four straight aqua tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV floated at a 4.78% higher speed than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.

Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV slipped out at a 1.06% higher speed than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>

Gravel Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two gravel handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 0.68% faster around a lap than the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV.

Best In Gravel Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

See how the Gravel Handling winner was calculated >>

Gravel Traction

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was better during two gravel traction tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV had 9.39% better traction on gravel than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.

Best In Gravel Traction: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

See how the Gravel Traction winner was calculated >>

Sand Traction

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was better during one sand traction tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV had 0.52% better traction in sand than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.

Best In Sand Traction: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

See how the Sand Traction winner was calculated >>

Grass Traction

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was better during one grass traction tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV had 17.27% better traction on grass than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.

Best In Grass Traction: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

See how the Grass Traction winner was calculated >>

Grass Tractoin

Best In Grass Tractoin: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

See how the Grass Tractoin winner was calculated >>

Mud Traction

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one mud traction tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 had 0.53% better traction in mud than the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV.

Best In Mud Traction: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

See how the Mud Traction winner was calculated >>

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV performed equally well in subj. comfort tests.

Best In Subj. Comfort: Both tires performed equally well

See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>

Subj. Noise

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV performed equally well in subj. noise tests.

Best In Subj. Noise: Both tires performed equally well

See how the Subj. Noise winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two noise tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 measured 1.08% quieter than the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV.

Best In Noise: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Wear

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was better during one wear tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV is predicted to cover 7.95% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.

Best In Wear: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

See how the Wear winner was calculated >>

Value

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one value tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 proved to have a 10.12% better value based on price/1000km than the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV.

Best In Value: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

See how the Value winner was calculated >>

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 had a 1.92% lower rolling resistance than the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV.

Best In Rolling Resistance: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>

Energy Consumption

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was better during one energy consumption tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV used 4.25% less energy than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.

Best In Energy Consumption: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

See how the Energy Consumption winner was calculated >>

Range

Best In Range: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

See how the Range winner was calculated >>

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV lost 1.86% less particle wear matter than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.

Best In Abrasion: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>